VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (with Adreno 618 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (2)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 732G
29
Dimensity 700
28
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Snapdragon 732G
22
Dimensity 700
21
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 732G
84
Dimensity 700
85
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 732G
38
Dimensity 700
36
Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
- Performs 74% better in floating-point computations
- 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 700
- Higher GPU frequency (~15%)
- Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
- Supports 15% higher memory bandwidth (17.07 against 14.9 GB/s)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 732G
vs
Dimensity 700
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 732G+2%
395451
Dimensity 700
387201
| CPU | 132406 | 127183 |
| GPU | 79345 | 75727 |
| Memory | 75270 | 90997 |
| UX | 108430 | 93294 |
| Total score | 395451 | 387201 |
GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 732G+5%
747
Dimensity 700
711
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 732G+3%
1843
Dimensity 700
1783
| Asset compression | 94.4 MB/sec | 95.7 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 47.2 pages/sec | 47.7 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 66.4 Mpixels/sec | 66.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 36.4 images/sec | 33.9 images/sec |
| HDR | 58.3 Mpixels/sec | 56.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 5.64 images/sec | 4.22 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 18.8 images/sec | 15.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.74 Mpixels/sec | 2.64 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 732G
521
Dimensity 700+139%
1246
Promotion
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Snapdragon 732G
1116
Dimensity 700+7%
1194
| Stability | 99% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Score | 1116 | 1194 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 46 FPS [Ultra] | 51 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 36 FPS [Ultra] | 37 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 38 FPS [Low] | 25 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 63 FPS [Low] | 59 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 61 FPS [Ultra] | 52 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 34 FPS [Medium] | 34 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 56 FPS [Ultra] | 56 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 1080 x 2400 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 732G and Dimensity 700
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 5 W | 6 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 825 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shaders | 256 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 422.4 Gigaflops | 243.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 688 | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
| Modem | X15 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 15 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 800 Mbps | Up to 2770 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 1250 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2020 | November 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM7150-AC | MT6833V/ZA |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G official site | MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose?
2214 (60%)
1473 (40%)
Total votes: 3687
Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
4. MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
7. MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
9. MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
10. MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Comments
Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 732G, or ask any questions
Beem11 April 2023 10:08
I like both of these processors, as I am using both of them. I have a Lava Blaze 5G phone and a Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. I also have an M1 iPad Pro, so I like that processor as well. I bought the Lava Blaze 5G because it is the cheapest 5G phone, and it gets slightly better 5G coverage than the S22 Ultra, thanks to its optimization. This Lava phone is the most affordable 5G option available in India, at just 140 USD. As a result, I get 5G on my iPad and Redmi phone too, which is awesome!
0Reply
Vikash 23 May 2021 12:34
Playing game will definitely slow your phone whether you buy Snapdragon or mediatek's phone ...if you are a non gaming user you should go with mediatek otherwise go with Snapdragon ...but yeah let me tell you .. Snapdragon 732g gets heated up more than mediatek 700 ....I have both processor's phone
+116Reply
Me and yoy26 May 2021 13:34
You joking right? Mediatek was the most terrible smart phone processer kirin Huawei and Samsung exynos are way better than mediatek! Mediatek is a trash!
+64Reply
Gilbert27 May 2021 12:04
Me and yoy, Lol do you even hands on dimensity phones?? Don't judge blindly if you don't know anything
+51Reply
Wews02 June 2021 14:07
it depends on the software. Miui always make their phones heat up plus the build quality of redmi, poco and mi phones are the worst. My brother owns a moto g60 which it has sd 732g and it runs games smoothly because his phone has only stock android which is not heavy.
+19Reply
Wews15 August 2021 12:23
Me and yoy, 'was the worst' You still living in 2018?MediaTek have improved a lotCheck the market share tooThey have the highest market share currently
+13Reply
Just a Gamer28 October 2021 16:04
Me and yoy, mediatek processors was good Doesn't heat up easily like Kirin snapdragon or exynos when playing or using for long time
+6Reply
lucna02 December 2021 05:49
Yeah true i do agree. while I don't trust the MTK Helio lineup due to the heat it generates, this dimensity chip is actually run cool and efficient.
+6Reply
BGso27 January 2022 19:27
Well, the camera is also better on snapdragon, they have better ISP.. at least this two compared.
+2Reply
Promotion
